help with this assignment 22

Note: Feel free to create a Sketchboard (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (instead of a written CRR) in response to the CRR questions. You can then use Screencastify to narrate how the images/symbols and connections you make answer the questions below. Then, you can submit the link to your screencast through this assignment page.

Questions to Answer:

  1. What is the white racial frame and how does it operate?
  2. What is a “field of racial positions” and “racial triangulation”? And how does Kim argue that Asian Americans have been “racially triangulated” within this “field of racial positions”?
  3. What is “differential racialization” and the factors that are part of the processes by which it happens?
  4. What are “racial hierarchies” and the process by which they are created?

Pick Three to Answer:

  1. What is the relationship of Feagin’s theory of the “white racial frame,” and Kim’s notion of “discourse” as a process that generates a “field of racial positions”?
  2. What does Kim argue are the key processes by which Asian Americans experience “racial triangulation”?
  3. What are the relationships between the white racial frame and the model minority myth?
  4. How does Pulido argue that the process of racialization is one that is distinctive and specific?
  5. How does going beyond the Black/White binary relate to powell’s statements regarding our need to move past “disparities” into deeper understandings of “structural marginalization”?
  6. Pulido argues that there is a dialectic that occurs between processes of class formation and racial ideologies. What examples does she use to support this claim?

Rubric

CRR 5 Rubric

CRR 5 Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnswer CRR QuestionsAnswered all CRR questions in a thorough Manner.

8.0 to >0.0 pts

Full Marks

Demonstrates a clear understanding of the readings and the author’s main points by answering CRR questions using textual evidence (e.g., direct quotes, and passage paraphrasing) to support these points and explicit citations to the texts.

0.0 pts

Does not demonstrate

Does not demonstrate a clear understanding of the reading. Does not articulate author’s main points. Does not use textual evidence to support assertions/arguments/analysis. Does not use citations to text.

8.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeText ConversationsPlace texts in conversation with each other.

6.0 to >0.0 pts

Full Marks

Compares, contrasts, and synthesizes assigned texts in relation to each other to demonstrate expanded understandings of key concepts/theories that a single reading does not provide. For example, “Grande’s theory of Red Pedagogy paired with Marx’s Theory of Historical Materialism allow us to understand x, y, and z about capitalism and schooling.”

0.0 pts

Does not place texts in conversation

Does not compare, contrast, or synthesize the assigned texts to demonstrate the ways in which the pairing of texts allow us a greater understanding of theories or concepts presented in each text.

6.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConversation with the textsIndividual analysis of texts

6.0 to >0.0 pts

Full Marks

Draws on readings and other content, e.g., current events, in relation to personal experiences to include individual, thoughtful analysis and interpretations of the texts under examination for CRR.

0.0 pts

Conversation with the texts

Does not draw on the reading, current events, and personal experience to analyze and interpret the text’s theories/key concepts.

6.0 pts

Total Points: 20.0

[checkout]

"Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?


If yes Order Similar Paper